Key points
- Every material claim should be tied to a document, named source or reproducible calculation.
- Project status terms must be defined and dated.
- Organizations facing criticism receive a meaningful right of reply.
Build the evidence file
The investigation record should contain contracts where public, regulatory filings, procurement notices, official progress reports, company statements, site evidence and interview notes.
Define status precisely
“Approved,” “under construction,” “commissioning,” “operational” and “commercial operation” are not synonyms. The project page must identify the source and date for each status.
Separate evidence from inference
VOLTLENS will label calculations and analytical conclusions, publish methodology, and avoid presenting a plausible explanation as an established fact.
Right of reply
Material criticism should be shared with the relevant organization with enough specificity and time for a substantive response.
Relevant source links: BPDB fuel-wise capacity · BPDB daily generation archive · VOLTLENS standards.
Where this article describes a framework or proposed workflow, it is clearly identified as VOLTLENS analysis rather than an official claim.